Author |
Topic |
|
scorsese
23 Posts |
Posted - 07/21/2013 : 23:39:25
|
When people have similar injuries, why do some end up with chronic pain while others recover and are pain free? The first longitudinal brain imaging study to track participants with a new back injury has found the chronic pain is all in their heads -- quite literally. Share This: 225
A new Northwestern Medicine study shows for the first time that chronic pain develops the more two sections of the brain -- related to emotional and motivational behavior -- talk to each other. The more they communicate, the greater the chance a patient will develop chronic pain.
The finding provides a new direction for developing therapies to treat intractable pain, which affects 30 to 40 million adults in the United States.
Researchers were able to predict, with 85 percent accuracy at the beginning of the study, which participants would go on to develop chronic pain based on the level of interaction between the frontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens.
The study is published in the journal Nature Neuroscience.
"For the first time we can explain why people who may have the exact same initial pain either go on to recover or develop chronic pain," said A. Vania Apakarian, senior author of the paper and professor of physiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
"The injury by itself is not enough to explain the ongoing pain. It has to do with the injury combined with the state of the brain. This finding is the culmination of 10 years of our research."
The more emotionally the brain reacts to the initial injury, the more likely the pain will persist after the injury has healed. "It may be that these sections of the brain are more excited to begin with in certain individuals, or there may be genetic and environmental influences that predispose these brain regions to interact at an excitable level," Apkarian said.
The nucleus accumbens is an important center for teaching the rest of the brain how to evaluate and react to the outside world, Apkarian noted, and this brain region may use the pain signal to teach the rest of the brain to develop chronic pain.
"Now we hope to develop new therapies for treatment based on this finding," Apkarian added.
Chronic pain participants in the study also lost gray matter density, which is likely linked to fewer synaptic connections or neuronal and glial shrinkage, Apkarian said. Brain synapses are essential for communication between neurons.
"Chronic pain is one of the most expensive health care conditions in the U. S. yet there still is not a scientifically validated therapy for this condition," Apkarian said. Chronic pain costs an estimated $600 billion a year, according to a 2011 National Academy of Sciences report. Back pain is the most prevalent chronic pain condition.
A total of 40 participants who had an episode of back pain that lasted four to 16 weeks -- but with no prior history of back pain -- were studied. All subjects were diagnosed with back pain by a clinician. Brain scans were conducted on each participant at study entry and for three more visits during one year.
Other Northwestern authors on the paper include lead author Marwan N. Baliki, Bogdan Petre, Souraya Torbey, Kristina M. Herrmann, Lejian Huang and Thomas J. Schnitzer.
The study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health grant NS35115.
|
|
gigalos
Netherlands
310 Posts |
Posted - 07/22/2013 : 00:39:19
|
The progress of science... I wonder if they contemplate the possibility that the pain is not only a perception inside the brain but that the brain in some way develops real changes in the body which in turn give chronic pain.... What's the email address of that Apakarian guy?
thanx scorsese |
|
|
GTfan
USA
84 Posts |
Posted - 07/24/2013 : 09:48:03
|
Can you post the URL of this article? I'd like to share. |
|
|
scorsese
23 Posts |
|
tennis tom
USA
4749 Posts |
Posted - 07/26/2013 : 07:25:55
|
Interesting article, thanks for posting it. It shows how "modern" medical science continues to ignore the HUMAN in the chronic pain equation. All talk of the anatomy of the brain, gray matter, neurons, synapses, frontal cortex, nucleus accubens, nature vs nurture, etc.-- apparently not a mention of the work of Dr. Sarno, in a study of BACK PAIN and the brain!--Sarno is the 800 pound gorilla in the lab.
From their language, the clinicians are obviously looking for a medical "treatment"--a PILL--to solve the chronic back-pain riddle. Much easier then looking to the laboratory of life for answers. But, what would you expect from a study subsidized by a grant to a group of neurologists--"Don't ask a barber if you need a haircut." If your only tool is a hammer, the world's a mind-field to hammer on.
tt/lsmft |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|