TMSHelp Forum
TMSHelp Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Resources | Links | Policy
Username:
Password:

Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 TMSHelp
 TMSHelp General Forum
 New book debunks role of unconscious
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

shawnsmith

Czech Republic
2048 Posts

Posted - 03/25/2008 :  06:04:22  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
THE NORMAL PERSONALITY: A New Way of Thinking About People

by STEVEN REISS

Freud is dead, but psychoanalysis is not. His practice of probing patients for unconscious factors has been criticized for making sexual or aggressive desires appear stronger than they are in reality. Here, Reiss takes the criticism one step farther by arguing that the diagnoses of personality disorders, as well as the role of the unconscious, is not well grounded. In a time when children, and even house hold pets, swallow Prozac, Reiss revives a neglected diagnosis for worrywarts, wallflowers, daydreamers, pessimists, and eccentrics alike: normal. He broadens normality by outlining how abnormal behaviors can arise when life motives are obstructed or personal values contradicted. Reiss lists how various combinations of 16 basic desires lead to dilemmas that eventually bring people to counseling. He offers a way to manage personal problems, without cracking the medicine cabinet or the skeleton closet. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008, 201 p., hardcover, $26.00.

Big Rob

32 Posts

Posted - 03/25/2008 :  06:49:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I always though Freud spent too long thinking about sex.

Albert Ellis was the guy who founded CBT and effectively debunked some of what Freud said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Ellis

Although I still think he valued Freud's concept of the unconscious.
Go to Top of Page

mk6283

USA
272 Posts

Posted - 03/25/2008 :  10:20:11  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Freud got too immersed in all of his sex theories and, unfortunately, that is a major contributing factor in why he fell out of favor with so many in the medical profession (well that and the discovery of DNA). Even Dr. Sarno admits that Freud's sex detour was unfortunate in that respect. However, his work on the unconscious, in my opinion, is still revolutionary and of extreme importance to us all. The efforts to dissociate it from the rest of the TMS theory, as occurs occasionally on this forum, is, again in my opinion, the wrong thing to do.

Best,
MK
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
TMSHelp Forum © TMSHelp.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000