TMSHelp Forum
TMSHelp Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Resources | Links | Policy
 All Forums
 TMSHelp
 TMSHelp General Forum
 Howard Stern Today

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Dave Posted - 09/18/2006 : 11:47:05
Many of you know that Howard Stern is a big supporter (and patient) of Dr. Sarno.

On today's show he described to Howie Mandel (who suffers from OCD) how he cured his OCD using Dr. Sarno's information.

He mentioned that his OCD lifted almost instantaneously while reading Dr. Sarno's Healing Back Pain after realizing that the theory applies to OCD as well.

He played psychologist for awhile with Mandel, exploring the pressures in his life and trying to figure out what the OCD was distracting him from. He suggested that the OCD might be a way of punishing himself.

I always find it interesting when Stern talks about this stuff ... even his own staff is skeptical.
20   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
tennis tom Posted - 10/04/2006 : 10:57:11
quote:
Originally posted by DR. CHRIS

TT. Just for the record, And if you want some of the GW money? You might want to get his name right, It is Sir Richard Branson and he does not suffer, Nore is he aware of TMS. If he did I am sure he would donate it to this very worthy forum. Keep up the work.



Thanks for the correcton doc. I will rewrite my ap to Sir Richard and hopefully he will mail me my Prius post-haste.

Welcome to the forum. Are you a TMS doctor and if so can we add you to the TMS resource list?

Cheers,
tt
DR. CHRIS Posted - 10/03/2006 : 23:37:11
TT. Just for the record, And if you want some of the GW money? You might want to get his name right, It is Sir Richard Branson and he does not suffer, Nore is he aware of TMS. If he did I am sure he would donate it to this very worthy forum. Keep up the work.
Plantweed Posted - 09/25/2006 : 06:14:54
Howard is pure id...for 5 hours a day he puts away the public facade we all have to create to "cope" with life and other people, and lets it all hang out, all those sometimes ugly, many times funny desires and fears we all have tucked away (many of which cause physical pain!). He's one of the best interviewers ever, no phoney baloney press junket fluff, and when the staff get going with their stories sometimes you have to pull over from laughing so much. And Fred is amazing on the sound effects.
Nor Posted - 09/23/2006 : 19:59:49
Glad to see I have fellow Stern fans on board w/me. I sometimes feel like I'm all alone. I agree that most people who think he's disgusting never really listen to him. After getting to know the cast of characters and hearing them all banter and laugh at situations, you develop an appreciation for his humor. I personally don't care for all the potty humor and obsession w/porn but I exercise my right to change the station at that point (usually to Nat'l Public Radio which is quite an extreme). My favorite bits are the ones where he makes fun of Hollywood!
Nor
sooverit Posted - 09/23/2006 : 01:32:38
[quote]Originally posted by Stryder
[
TT said: I just heard on FOX NEWS that there are rumors he might return to regular radio because he is loseing his audience.

Not surprised. I don't think its Howard, i think Sirius didn't "get it".

Ok, i just need to clear something up here...I am a longtime fan and made the move to Sirius last year. I listen every single day and at least once a day Howard talks about how much he loves being on satellite and being free. He actually played those news reports that claimed he wants to go back to terrestrial radio and laughed at the blatant lies the press makes up. In no way is he leaving Sirius. That is a completely fabricated story.


BTW, for all the critics out there, how many of you ever listened to an entire show start to finish??? And I'm not talking about the naughty parts from the E channel.

Thanks to Howard many people have found (as Howard calls him) "the great Dr. Sarno". That alone should show everyone that he is a smart person.
johnnyg Posted - 09/22/2006 : 08:28:02
TT--

great summary. I've been beggin' for scraps like a dog!
h2oskier25 Posted - 09/22/2006 : 08:17:22
Originally posted by wrldtrv
quote:
Hey Spiro (TT) Agnew. I thought you were a conservative. You should be outraged


Originally posted by wrldtrv
quote:
Not to bring up another sore subject, TT, but remember the Andrew Weil thread? You might want to revise your opinion . . .


Originally posted by wrldtrv
quote:
. . . you should not generalize the liberal politics of the Bay Area to the rest of the country.



wrldtrv, I'm not trying to stir the pot here, but you sure seem to want to get into it with TT.

TT, don't ya' love it when people tell you how you should feel and how you should think.

Beth
tennis tom Posted - 09/21/2006 : 23:29:22


QuoteJG:

"honesty and fair play" you have to be friggin joking. There hasn't been any of that in politics since teddy roosevelt.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Of course 99 out of 100 politicians are scum-bags and share more in common with their co-horts on the otherside than with their constituents. They show-off their Red Army watches that they trade for Bulovas all the time. But what choice do we have, you vote your wallet and vote for the lies you want to believe.

The trick is to keep the two parties somewhat in check so they don't do any real damage to us. Which-ever party wins power, it going to plunder the National Treasury, give it to themselves formost, to their friends, (those who contributed to their campaigns), and a little may trickle down to us schmcuks at the bottom called citizens.

As it stands today, if you are in the private sector, you vote Repub, in the dream that taxes won't be toatlly dumped on you. If you wallow at the public trough, you vote Dem, because they are the party of the "poor", and will raise taxes on the "rich".

johnnyg Posted - 09/21/2006 : 15:07:42
I thought TT was being sarcastic about his politics -- "honesty and fair play" you have to be friggin joking. There hasn't been any of that in politics since teddy roosevelt.
wrldtrv Posted - 09/21/2006 : 12:37:22
Not to bring up another sore subject, TT, but remember the Andrew Weil thread? You might want to revise your opinion of him as you work your way through The Divided Mind. Read p.277. There, the TMS physician responsible for that chapter mentions Dr Weil favorably and gives him credit for introducing him to Sarno's ideas.

By the way, you should not generalize the liberal politics of the Bay Area to the rest of the country. In your small area of the world, liberals might have some influence and you might feel overwhelmed, but that is certainly not the case in most of the rest of the country. But since you've been there your whole life you might not know this. Believe me, nearly everywhere else, Republicans are not the poor downtrodden folk you make them out to be.
tennis tom Posted - 09/21/2006 : 09:12:32
quoteing Dave:

"But let's not let this thread degrade into another debate."
----------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed Dave! I have learned my lesson from the Global Warming thread and will NOT leave myself open for name-calling again.

At least The King of All Media is somewhat more relavant to the topic of TMS than the GW thread was. Like any good Greek tragedy, it's good to have a little comic relief, from all the pain and suffering on ocassion.

I would be willing to act pathetic though, for any sum above $5, and where do I get in line for the billions Virgin's Peter Branson is giving away to stop the epedemic of GW?
Dave Posted - 09/21/2006 : 08:35:55
There is a nuance to Stern that long-time listeners just get. It is really not possible to explain why he is not being mean spirited to "Gary the Retard" or why he is not promoting racism when he has the head of the KKK on his show. Stern winks at those who get it, while dismissing and/or poking fun at those who take him seriously or attach some political or social significance to his show. For some reason, many people who don't like his brand of entertainment are unable to simply tune out and move on. They must brand him as evil and crusade against him.

It's an interesting social phenomenon, really. But let's not let this thread degrade into another debate.

Reagarding TMS, I believe Howard has probably helped hundreds of people get out of pain by publicizing Dr. Sarno's books. He even helped Dr. Sarno himself to expand his theory beyond back pain. But just like there are many people who will never get Howard, there will be many who will never get TMS, and are condemned to live a life with psychogenic symptoms.
tennis tom Posted - 09/21/2006 : 00:07:56
quote:
Originally posted by wrldtrv

Hey Spiro (TT) Agnew. I thought you were a conservative. You should be outraged at Stern's trashing of the culture. He might be giving attention to the dwarfs, retarded...but what kind of attention? Seems to me he is using them to get laughs.

For me, his humor gets old very fast. Each to his own.



World,

I don't know where you got the notion that I am a CONSERVATIVE. If anything I am an anarchist. I go with the flow and anarchy is what we have out here on the left-coast.

I think for myself and decide each issue on it's own merits. I don't tow the party line nor obey the PC police. On some issues I would be viewed as liberal, on some conservative. But I don't accept any politcal label. I am just a life long-registerd Deomocrat who votes for every Republican I can find--which is darn few out here.

I think a TMS trait is being for the underdog and Repubs are defintely the underdog here in frisco and southern marin, because they believe in America, fair play, honesty, are G-d fearing people and are not hipocrites. It's as simple as that. They are an endangered species.

Although you feel I could not possibly like watching the "King of All Media", because he is "liberal", I exercise my right to watch anyone I want. Howard thankfully doesn't get politcal like Letterman--now there's a tired act which I have stopped watching out of abject bordom--how often can one guess, "Will it float?"?

Howard sticks with what he knows best, foxes, freaks and flatulence. Hookers and porn stars are people too! It's a $50,000,000.00 winning formula. He's the P.T. Barnum of our era. In the good old days you would have to go to a carnival side show to see such acts. Today you can see it in the comfort of your living rooom.

Yes, Howard uses dwarfs and 'tards to get laughs. They seem to enjoy all the attention and celebrity--better than being passed out drunk under a piece of cardboard in Times Square. He even gets 'em laid once in a while, a great act of philanthropic servicing.
wrldtrv Posted - 09/20/2006 : 12:41:29
Hey Spiro (TT) Agnew. I thought you were a conservative. You should be outraged at Stern's trashing of the culture. He might be giving attention to the dwarfs, retarded...but what kind of attention? Seems to me he is using them to get laughs.

For me, his humor gets old very fast. Each to his own.
ndb Posted - 09/20/2006 : 09:16:55
I thought Stern's movie (I think it was called Private Parts) was very sweet and funny. Its the story of how his show came to be.

ndb
Dave Posted - 09/20/2006 : 07:32:24
IMO Howard's TV shows never showcase the best parts of his radio show. They choose to focus on T&A and celebrity guests, which are not very interesting to me. I prefer when they are just talking, spoofing on the day's news, which often leads to spontaneous improv that can be side splittingly funny at times.

Howard is different from other "shock jocks" in that he is very intelligent and just has a way to cut through the BS, ignore political correctness, and say the things that many of us feel but don't dare say.

I bet his show has helped keep his TMS symptoms at bay because the character he plays on the radio is an outlet for the angry child inside. In "real life" Howard is portrayed by many as one of the nicest guys you'll meet.
Plantweed Posted - 09/20/2006 : 06:06:20
If it wasn't for Howard I might never have found Sarno. He's been an advocate for many years.
tennis tom Posted - 09/19/2006 : 23:29:02
quote:
Originally posted by wrldtrv

I think it's great that Stern is a Sarno fan, but frankly, I've thought he was in the least bit funny. More pathetic, really. He and his guests.




Hi wrldtrv,

Howard is a champion of the little people. He has given much exposure to alcoholic and semi-retarded dwarfs, that no other media outlet would ever do.

He is also a champion of women, donating much needed plastic surgery and breast enhancements, enabling their self-esteem.

I would be happy to be pathetic if I had a $50,000,000.00 contract.

I respectfully agree with your right to disagree about Howard Stern, and I will not resort to any name calling--you effete snob.
wrldtrv Posted - 09/19/2006 : 22:40:58
I think it's great that Stern is a Sarno fan, but frankly, I've thought he was in the least bit funny. More pathetic, really. He and his guests.
Stryder Posted - 09/19/2006 : 21:14:48
I mostly listened to his radio show. Some days I would be laughing so hard my eyes would water. I didnt always agree what Howard would say, but I surely respected his fortitude to speak his mind. For all those who used to complain about the content, I would just turn it off if I wasn't amused. I have no idea why people didn't understand this concept.

TT said: I just heard on FOX NEWS that there are rumors he might return to regular radio because he is loseing his audience.

Not surprised. I don't think its Howard, i think Sirius didn't "get it".

You know, when I first heard Howard was going to Sirius, the monthly fee for SR was something like $15 per month for 200 channels. I thought that was a bit too much, so I sent several emails to Sirius saying something like, "Hey, you guys. You need another price point, like $7.95 per month for 30 channels, $5.95 for 10 channels. Or else you will never get people to move over from FM."

When Verizon decided to get huge defection from cable internet, what did Verizon do? They offered a lower speed DSL (768K) for only $14.95 per month. One half their other tier. Verzion "got it" and got huge adoption.

Sirius should do the same.

-Stryder

TMSHelp Forum © TMSHelp.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000