| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| shawnsmith |
Posted - 08/29/2017 : 06:35:27
Freud was a lousy scientist. He fudged data; he made unsubstantiated claims; he took credit for other people’s ideas. Sometimes he lied.
He’s been debunked again and again—and yet we still can’t give him up.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/why-freud-survives?mbid=social_facebook |
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Fox |
Posted - 09/13/2017 : 15:12:46
After all, Freud bashing has, unfortunately, been the rage for decades. So, to the New Yorker staff, or to most anyone else, this wouldn't have been seen as a very controversial point of view. |
| Fox |
Posted - 09/06/2017 : 14:11:39
I subscribe to the New Yorker mag and think it's great. Just because the New Yorker published an article that bashed Freud, it doesn't mean that the New Yorker staff all hate Freud. |
| tennis tom |
Posted - 09/06/2017 : 10:13:16
SS, how you doin' with all your new Hatian friends sleeping in your living room? Maybe you can buddy-up to a voo-doo doctor and he can have a midnight chicken killing ceremony in the backyard and fix your TMS. |
| shawnsmith |
Posted - 09/06/2017 : 09:08:35
Those who think the New Yorker is no longer a good publication need to read this excellent piece: http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/trumps-move-to-end-daca-and-echoes-of-the-immigration-act-of-1924 |
| altherunner |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 21:01:22
ha ha! our medical doesn't cover funny glasses, we have to make our own, btw our PM prefers Justine just so you know |
| tennis tom |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 20:58:06
quote:
Originally posted by shawnsmith
Well, whether you like the New Yorker or not, the article is spot on. quote:
Originally posted by Sam908
The New Yorker? It ceased being a credible source of information since Harold Ross died in 1951.
You been looken' up at the eclipse without those special glasses SS? |
| shawnsmith |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 16:33:40
Well, whether you like the New Yorker or not, the article is spot on. quote:
Originally posted by Sam908
The New Yorker? It ceased being a credible source of information since Harold Ross died in 1951.
|
| tennis tom |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 15:16:33
quote:
Originally posted by Fox
Interesting article. Maybe Freud wasn't perfect, but he influenced the Good Doctor positively in the development of his ideas on psychosomatic disorders/mind body interaction/TMS, and for that I am deeply grateful to Freud.
"LIKE"--Too bad this site doesn't have a "like" button or I would hit it. |
| Fox |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 10:58:19
Interesting article. Maybe Freud wasn't perfect, but he influenced the Good Doctor positively in the development of his ideas on psychosomatic disorders/mind body interaction/TMS, and for that I am deeply grateful to Freud. |
| tennis tom |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 10:49:17
quote:
Originally posted by Sam908
The New Yorker? It ceased being a credible source of information since Harold Ross died in 1951.
Agreed! The only thing they had going were their cartoons.
I think SS has suffered a Freudian slip and fall--could be a TMS/affective symptom--or something in the beer up north. |
| Sam908 |
Posted - 08/31/2017 : 05:03:57
The New Yorker? It ceased being a credible source of information since Harold Ross died in 1951. |
